Learn more about the Asilomar AI Principles that resulted from the conference, the process involved in developing them, and the resulting discussion about each. Summary Statement of the Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA Molecules. Paul Berg, David Baltimore, Sydney Brenner, Richard O. Roblin, and Maxine. October 14 – 18, – Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove, California // Course# MMH Agenda/Program | Faculty/Speakers | Conference.
|Published (Last):||6 February 2009|
|PDF File Size:||14.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.65 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Never had a yoghurt generated so much expectation.
Nor so much controversy. The CRISPR-Cas9 system was discovered for the first time back inwhen Philippe Horvath and Rodolphe Barrangou were studying why certain bacteria suffered viral infections which reduced the productivity and yield in cultures. Scientists at Danisco, later acquired by DuPont, had devoted themselves to sequencing conferenciq genome of Streptococcus thermophilusa well-known bacterium in industrial cheese and yoghurt production.
2018 Conference Photos
When studying this micro-organism, they realised that it contained repeated genetic sequences, which they called CRISPR. Despite their unpronounceable name, the sequences served the microbes as virus recognition systems, fending off viruses with interfering RNA molecules.
What they were faced with then was not merely a quirk of these lactic bacteria, but asilkmar key mechanism in adaptive microbial immunity.
Thus was born a new revolution in the history of genetic engineering. The Doudna research group. Not only owing to aeilomar countless applications in fields such as medicine with the development of modified macaques to better study disease or to precisely cure different pathologiesagriculture and the environment, but also due to its similarity with the “molecular scissors” which has enabled the spectacular development of biotechnology that we have witnessed in recent decades.
Undoubtedly, genetic modification has been instrumental in achieving, among other breakthroughs, recombinant insulin, crops resistant to drought or saline confreencia, new vaccines and micro-organisms that clean up contaminated areas.
Nonetheless, this scientific progress has been marked by extensive bioethical controversy. The birth of recombinant DNA technology was received positively, although it also gave rise to misgivings and fears owing to its implications.
The same is now occurring with CRISPR-Cas9, a system which is characterised not only by editing the genome, but particularly by doing so in a conferecia, precise and effective manner.
Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies
The similarities between the birth of genetic engineering and Doudna and Charpentier’s genomic editing have led a number of researchers to express the need to promote another Asilomar 2.
That encounter, organised back in by Paul Berg, served to establish a moratorium on the application of genetic engineering, to discuss the possible donferencia and dangers, and to debate on the importance of the principle of precaution: Just like what occurred with recombinant DNA technology, the creators of CRISPR-Cas9 systems are fully aware of the important bioethical implications entailed with this scientific breakthrough.
The document suggested the need to discuss the social, environmental and ethical implications of this technology, also urging the scientific community to refrain from using CRISPR-Cas9 to genetically modify the germ-line for possible clinical applications in humans. Was science more rapid than bioethical reflection?
Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA – Wikipedia
For this reason, the meeting held in Lindau, with conferncia attendance of young researchers and Nobel Prize winners, drew attention to the need to encourage a rational debate, in which the importance of communicating scientific results to the community is also highlighted.
The expert agrees with the need to organise a conference similar to Asilomar, although he points out that the debate should also address all possible genetic engineering tools, not only that created by Doudna and Charpentier.
Greely also affirms that, as occurred with recombinant DNA, this technology may have an impact on the planet’s biodiversity, in addition awilomar being the focus of debate in other matters related with industrial property and patents.
So what will happen from this point on? As all asilomaf specialists consulted explain, we stand on the threshold of organising a second Asilomar in the middle of the 21st century. And what will the outcome be?
Although it is difficult to predict the outcome of bioethical debate, researchers such as J. Log in Apply for an account Contact us. Powered by Open Consortium.